‘Uncategorized’ Category

Thai WildLife Raids UPDATE

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

By Nicola Gothard

Since I wrote the last article much has happened over in Thailand.  A famous Thai musician went down to WFFT to show his support which held up proceedings for a day but culminated in his arrest. The DNP then went away for a long weekend and returned with a vengeance. More armed guards than ever camped out on WFFT grounds and the Director General arrived on site in a helicopter. Despite promising on National Television that he would leave WFFT alone once he had seen the paperwork, he then deemed that he wasn’t happy with the animal welfare at WFFT and the DNP proceeded to confiscate animals. This is laughable, considering the conditions most wild animals are kept in Thailand and the state of the DNP ‘rescue’ centres (example).

They started with the sun bears – this is interesting considering they are of high commercial value in the illegal wildlife trade! By the time I woke up this morning they had drowned a macaque in their clumsy, inexperienced attempts to capture it! In total yesterday, 54 animals were cruelly snatched away from their homes including; 26 macaques,11 gibbons, 5 bears, 8 leopard cats, 1 otter, 2 oriental pied hornbill and 1 great hornbill.

I can’t imagine the stress this is putting on all the animals, staff and volunteers at WFFT! It make me so angry that these animals have been rescued from animal abuse once  and are now suffering as pawns in a game of retribution!

Actions

Today I think we should focus on tourism in Thailand. The Department of National Parks is clearly corrupt or on a vendetta against WFFT from the bottom to the top of the department. So, we need to force their hand using another, more powerful, government department. Tourism is a huge part of the Thai economy and they will care what the world thinks of Thailand!

1.   Tweet your views on the wildlife raid to @ThailandFanClub and don’t forget to use the hashtag #ThaiWildLifeRaid

2. Post your views on the wildlife raid on the Tourism Thailand Facebook wall https://www.facebook.com/AmazingThailand

3. Send a message via the contact form on the Tourism Thailand website http://www.tourismthailand.org/contact-us

4. This is a link to the resource centre set up to help people find information and take action for WFFT. If you are interested in finding out more or taking further action then please visit http://www.wix.com/anoelle45/wffthelp#!

Wildlife Rescue Centre Raids in Thailand

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

By Nicola Gothard

The Department of National Parks in Thailand have been carrying out raids on NGO sanctuaries after an ‘anonymous’ tip off about animal cruelty and holding animals without the correct paperwork.

WFFT, a well respected wild animal rescue centre, was ambushed by National Park officials and given 3 hours to present the paperwork for 450 animals. They then proceeded to arrest staff and confiscate the animals. The same thing happened at Elephant Nature Park and several other smaller NGOs.  The animals are being man handled and mistreated by National Park staff, then loaded on to trucks in tiny cages, whilst the volunteers and staff at the sanctuary look on in horror. In a further ludicrous act the confiscated wildlife were taken to profit making, run down zoos. Hundreds of animals which have already had a rough life are now scared and suffering unnecessarily.

Why not raid trekking operators or zoos or even confiscate all the poor animals used for tourist photos on beaches? Well, probably because they didn’t vocalise their concern about recent elephant poaching in National Parks. It is believed that certain people in the  forestry department were involved in this activity and the raids are an act of retribution for the NGOs implicating the forestry department in these crimes.

WFFT Thailand is a well respected animal sanctuary in Thailand that has been rescuing abused wildlife and assisting wild animals in need for many years. Elephant Nature Park rescues begging elephants, performing elephants and elephants used for trekking and provides them with a natural sanctuary where they don’t have to perform and are free to behave as elephants should.

The raids have been going on for four days now – causing immense distress to all concerned. We need to make Thailand aware that the world is watching and their tourism industry will suffer if they allow these kinds of corrupt heavy handed tactics to continue.

Actions

1.  Tweet  with this hashtag #ThaiWildlifeRaid – lets make the whole world aware of what is going on!

2. Sign this petition http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/urgent-plea-for-rescued-thai-wildlife/

3. Email the Director General of National Parks in Thailand  @ dg@dnp.go.th

4.Write to your Thai Embassy to make your feelings on the matter clear!

His Excellency Mr Kitti Wasinondh
Ambassador Extraordinary & Plenipotentiary

Royal Thai Embassy

29-30 Queen’s Gate

London
SW7 5JB

Email: thaiduto@btinternet.com

Concerned individuals outside of the UK will find the relevant contact details for their Thai Embassy athttp://www.thaiembassy.org/www.thaiembassy.org/

Lets do this people!!

Judge Dismisses PETA’s Case against SeaWorld

Thursday, February 9th, 2012

By Nicola Gothard

Recently PETA filed a law suit against Seaworld claiming that they had imprisoned legal persons, namely 5 orcas, and this was against the 13th amendment of the United States constitution, which outlaws slavery and involuntary servitude.  Surprise, Surprise, today it was thrown out of court because it has not yet been established that Orcas are ‘persons’ in the legal sense of the word. Surely anyone in their right mind would know that the issue of ‘person-hood’ needed addressing first? Just because they believe it goes without saying doesn’t mean it does. If you are going to take the game in to the court-room then you need to play by the rules of society. It just seems like a huge waste of time and like most things with PETA, just an excuse for publicity. If animal protection could be advanced by miles of press clippings then PETA would have already won the battle.  They must adhere to the mantra of  ’all publicity is good publicity’.

Sometimes I wonder if PETA is actually an organisation run by people who would rather discredit animal rights as a concept and halt all progress in animal protection. There is no doubt about it, they give animal protection/rights/welfare a bad name.  Their extreme publicity stunts make a mockery of us all and more importantly do nothing to change people that don’t already share their views, the words ‘preaching to the converted’ spring to mind. But, hey what does it even matter?  They take the moral high ground, they get coverage and their supporters give them more money and so it goes on!!

Perhaps if they had consulted with or listened to these guys at  www.nonhumananimalrightsproject.org then they would have made better use of their resources, then again do they care?

How Do Childrens Films Affect Empathy For Animals?

Sunday, July 31st, 2011

By Nicola Gothard

Two researchers – Matthew Cole and Kate Stewart  recently produced a paper that examined how movies encourage children to conceptually distance the animals they eat from those which they form an emotional bond such as pets. This post examines some of the points made in the paper.

I have often wondered why Disney films which frequently feature stories about animals don’t encourage more empathy and respect amongst children. For example ‘Finding Nemo’ appears to convey the message that fish belong in the sea and deserve their freedom. Yet sales in tropical fish,  rocketed after the film indicating that the wider audience did not take home that message.

Cole and Stewart argue that  in most films animals only become important when they transcend their species typical behaviours and take on human qualities. The characters become exceptions to the rules that define our relationship with that species. For example, Babe finds acceptance as a sheep dog-pig not as a pig (it is acceptable to care about dogs) or Nemo is special because he speaks like a human. In Happy Feet the Penguins are saved by dancing and in Chicken Run the Chickens conquer flight to escape their fate as food animals. The animal characters in these films are essentially humans in animal bodies and I think this is what limits our capacity to learn the lesson of empathy and respect for other animals.

Both Charlotte’s Webb and Babe have been cited as being responsible for a decrease in pork sales.  However this trend was fleeting and consumer behaviour returned back to normal soon after. Perhaps this was because in the eyes of the viewer Babe was a special pig and eventually they dissociated the character from the food they eat.

Carnivourous animals often  enjoy more complex characterisations where as prey animals are represented as a homogenous faceless mass. Cole and Stewart cite the Lion King as prime example of this. Pumba and Timone are  prey species but they are given special ‘companion animal’ status by the Lion. Stewart and Cole argue that where animals are allowed to transcend their fates as food it is because they have been given special consideration by the characters that the audience identify with (most like humans). Of course in more recent films like Madagascar the prey and the predator become friends and the predator fights against his nature to stop himself preying on other animals. In the end he eats sushi because in this film at least, fish don’t matter because they haven’t been given a human-like personality and therefore their feelings don’t matter – if they have any at all!

Stewart and Cole also argue that childrens fiction  has a tradition of associating the loss of sympathy or empathy for animals with growing up. For example in the Jungle book, Mowgli is tempted away from Baloo by the lithe water carrying girl in the local village.

Whilst this review is far from exhaustive, I do think that personifying animals in childrens literature does very little to foster respect and understanding for other species and this may account for why children don’t take home the messages that the films convey to me. This begs the question: How do we produce childrens fiction that doesn’t personify animals and encourages respect and empathy for other species independently of  the human relationship with them? Answers please!

Reference: Stewart, K., Cole, M. (2009) The Conceptual Separation of Food and Animals in Childhood. Food, Culture and Society 12(4): 457-476;

The Ethics of Pedigree Dog Breeding, Part 2

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

Man in the Mirror

Contributed by Alina Lilova

Summer is great for the elderly pooch, especially with a light T-shirt on for sun protection

But winter feels just miserable... Can't we breed iggies who are more heat-efficient?

I believe that the best, fastest way to change the status quo is if everybody who has a favourite breed could try to identify, honestly, both the positive and the negative welfare aspects of this breed—and accept the possibility that its appearance may have to change in the future. Confronting ourselves in this manner may be hard, but one day our dogs will be thankful that we did it. Just like our choices as farmers or consumers affect the lives of billions of sentient farm animals, our choices as breeders or members of the dog-buying public matter greatly to the world’s dogs.

With this belief, I will start with myself. I adore sighthounds – especially the smallest among them, the Italian greyhounds. My computer and drawers are full of “iggy” and greyhound pictures: photographs, old paintings, calendars. For 13 years, I owned a wonderful male Italian greyhound called Ernesto, or “Nesto.” Fortunately, despite the rarity of these dogs and the inbreeding atrocities visible in Nesto’s pedigree just four generations back, he didn’t suffer from the ailments commonly listed in breed descriptions – such as Progressive Retinal Atrophy or von Willebrand Disease. He did have epilepsy, though (and a family history of epilepsy), but he was lucky to be relatively unaffected by it, as it occurred only a few times in his life – which is not the case with all epileptic dogs.

(more…)

The Ethics of Pedigree Dog Breeding, Part 1

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

“It is fascinating to speculate how dogs and humans might co-evolve further. We cannot say exactly what the domestic dogs of the future will look like because we do not know what future humans will need and therefore value. But pedigree dogs, as they are currently defined, are doomed.”

–Paul McGreevy, comment in The New Scientist (“We must breed happier, healthier dogs,” 8 October 2008)

Irish Wolfhound Sam, photo by Tirwhan, Wikipedia

Contributed by Alina Lilova

In my early teens, I used to worship the world of the dog fancy, which I was familiar with through hobby magazines and occasional direct contact. I could recognise dozens upon dozens of breeds, I would read their entire standards, I thought dog shows were fascinating, and I dreamt of studying “cynology,” or canine science.

How disenchanted I am today. Over the years, I slowly came to realise that canine science rests on shaky biological grounds because it is not dog-centric as its name implies. The individual dog doesn’t matter as much as the frozen ideal of the breed. Selective breeding isn’t used to create happy and well-adjusted family pets, but to improve “breed quality,” i.e. match ever more closely what the dog looked like in a mythical past or will look like in a utopian future, as laid out in the sacred books of the kennel club.  Other concerns exist, but they are secondary.

Obsessively pursuing the Breed Standard like a pack of hounds, breeders risk losing sight of the animal welfare problems that come with their quest. The first problem is inbreeding, or the crossing of related individuals. While many laypeople believe that pedigrees serve to make sure no close relatives are mated, in fact the opposite is often true. The second problem is exaggerated physical traits: dog shows, like those fashion shows with super-skinny models, don’t always have the participant’s welfare in mind. In this article, I’m going to discuss the two issues as well as give my amateur opinion on some of the historical roots of the problem. (more…)

EXPOSED: Japan buys votes for whaling!!

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

British newspaper ‘The Sunday Times’ led an investigation in to allegations that Japan has been bribing smaller nations to vote in favour of allowing commercial whaling to recommence after a 24 year ban!

Many land-locked and/or poor countries have recently joined the International Whaling Commission after receiving large sums of  ‘aid’  from Japan and several countries have admitted they vote ‘pro-whaling’ because of the ”help” Japan has given them.

You can read the article in full here.

It appears that Japan is recruiting small nations in need of financial aid to join the whaling commission to bolster the number of pro-whaling votes. When the ban came in to place in 1986 anti-whaling countries far out-numbered pro-whaling nations. However over the years more pro-whaling nations have joined the commission – some of them completly land-locked.  Most of the anti-whaling nations are European with the notable exceptions of Denmark and Norway. However Europe must vote as a block and if they can’t agree all 22 European members will have to abstain from the vote – further bolstering Japans chances of success!

Emily Deschanel ”Bones” Talks about Veganism

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Actress Emily Deschanel is best known for playing a forensic scientist on the popular american crime show ‘Bones’. However she is also an animal advocate and has been vegan for 16 years. At a recent fundraiser for farm sanctuary she spoke about her reasons for becoming vegan and why she supports farm sanctuary.

Orangutan Rescue Mission in Borneo

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

Orangutan Outreach along with several other small organisations based in Asia have started a rescue mission in Borneo. There are hundreds of orangutans kept in small private cages all over borneo. It appears that it is often the case that the mothers are shot for meat and the babies are sold as pets only to live a life of misery – tied up or trapped in tiny cages, suffering from parasites, malnourishment and psychological torment.

If you are interested in finding out more about the rescue mission and endevour to create a sanctuary for these animals – please read this blog. It is fascinating, awe inspiring and heart-breaking. The people involved in this are true heroes and we must support them.

If you have any veterinary experience or experience of looking after wild animals – please consider volunteering!

Australia Files Law Suit Against Japan over Whaling

Friday, June 4th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

Australia took a decisive step to protect whales, filing a suit in the International Court of Justice against Japan’s “scientific whaling” in the Southern Ocean. The suit seeks an injunction to bar Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean Whaling Sanctuary a 50-million square kilometer area surrounding the continent of Antarctica, where the IWC has banned all types of commercial whaling.

This news comes as the International Whaling Commision meet to discuss a possible compromise with whaling nations that would allow them  to resume commercial whaling with the understanding that they abide by quotas. The IWC is the body responsible for the management of whaling and its main purpose is to regulate the whaling industry. Established in 1946, in 2008 it has over 79 member countries.

Australia claims that Japan has abused its right to conduct scientific research whaling under Article VIII of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, which provides for a scientific exemption. They also assert that Japan has breached the terms of CITES by hunting endangered whale species.  In 2008-09 Japan killed 1,004 whales, including 681 in the Southern Ocean. Since the moratorium came into effect, more than 33,000 whales have been killed under the scientific exemption clause.

The Australians are willing to call Japanese whaling what it is — a mockery of science and a crime against nature. Lets hope the rest of the international community back them up on this one!