Leaf Cake Anyone?

June 17th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

Leaf Cake

Ingredients

  • Lots of Leaves
  • Honey or Jam or Marmite or Peanut butter
  • Dry dog food or peanuts
  • A large plastic container e.g. a bin/trash can

Serves: 2 sunbears




Instructions

1. Start by putting  a layer of leaves in to the container. Compact them down dense.

2. Sprinkle bits of dog food

3. Add more leaves and compact

4. Drizzle honey over the leaves

5. Add more leaves and compact

6. Repeat this process until the container is full

7. Take to the enclosure and gently turn the container upside down and shake out the cake

As you may have guessed this cake is not fit for human consumption but I know a couple of sun bears that enjoyed it muchos. The leafcake is excellent environmental enrichment and could be adapted for other species.  It allows the bears to express their motivation to forage and use their senses of touch and smell to find the food.  It also prolongs the feeding process and gives them something to do. Animals in captivity can become very bored and it is important to provide environmental enrichment that allows them to express their natural internally motivated behaviours. These bears spent ages delicately sifting through the leaves to find the food and licking the honey coated leaves. They really seemed to enjoy themselves.

Tuck In!

I think I had a bit too much honey

EXPOSED: Japan buys votes for whaling!!

June 15th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

British newspaper ‘The Sunday Times’ led an investigation in to allegations that Japan has been bribing smaller nations to vote in favour of allowing commercial whaling to recommence after a 24 year ban!

Many land-locked and/or poor countries have recently joined the International Whaling Commission after receiving large sums of  ‘aid’  from Japan and several countries have admitted they vote ‘pro-whaling’ because of the ”help” Japan has given them.

You can read the article in full here.

It appears that Japan is recruiting small nations in need of financial aid to join the whaling commission to bolster the number of pro-whaling votes. When the ban came in to place in 1986 anti-whaling countries far out-numbered pro-whaling nations. However over the years more pro-whaling nations have joined the commission – some of them completly land-locked.  Most of the anti-whaling nations are European with the notable exceptions of Denmark and Norway. However Europe must vote as a block and if they can’t agree all 22 European members will have to abstain from the vote – further bolstering Japans chances of success!

Emily Deschanel ”Bones” Talks about Veganism

June 15th, 2010

Actress Emily Deschanel is best known for playing a forensic scientist on the popular american crime show ‘Bones’. However she is also an animal advocate and has been vegan for 16 years. At a recent fundraiser for farm sanctuary she spoke about her reasons for becoming vegan and why she supports farm sanctuary.

Toucan Kerplunk!

June 10th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

I came across an excellent environmental enrichment idea for long beaked birds such as toucans and hornbills.  An ingenious individual has adapted the popular game ‘Kerplunk’ to keep the birds entertained.  The birds must pull chopsticks out of a tube to obtain the treats hidden inside. You can read more about it here .

Captive animals can become very bored and develop abnormal behaviours because their behavioural repertoire is so restricted in captivity. Animals prefer to work for food because it stimulates their foraging instincts. Animals have evolved to find the process of searching for food rewarding through the release of happy hormones such as endophins. So animal keepers must find ways to simulate natural behaviours in an unnatural environment to ensure good welfare.

Orangutan Rescue Mission in Borneo

June 6th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

Orangutan Outreach along with several other small organisations based in Asia have started a rescue mission in Borneo. There are hundreds of orangutans kept in small private cages all over borneo. It appears that it is often the case that the mothers are shot for meat and the babies are sold as pets only to live a life of misery – tied up or trapped in tiny cages, suffering from parasites, malnourishment and psychological torment.

If you are interested in finding out more about the rescue mission and endevour to create a sanctuary for these animals – please read this blog. It is fascinating, awe inspiring and heart-breaking. The people involved in this are true heroes and we must support them.

If you have any veterinary experience or experience of looking after wild animals – please consider volunteering!

Give Whales A Voice @ IWC

June 5th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

The International Whaling Commission (IWC) will be meeting on 21st June to discuss a possible lifting of the commercial whaling ban. The IWC regulates the whaling industry and is responsible for the ban on commercial whaling which came in to force in 1986.  However the commission is largely focused on regulating the whaling industry so that it can be sustainable and the ban had little to do with animal welfare. Whale stocks were hunted to near extinction and a ban was necessary.  However three countries; Japan, Norway and Iceland have continued to hunt whales. Iceland and Norway have objected to the ban and set their own hunting quotas – ignoring international law. Japan operates it’s whaling industry under the guise of ’scientific’; research – the ban allows for limited whaling in the interest of scientific research. Australia have recently filed a suit claiming that Japanese whaling has nothing to do with science and is more commercially motivated.

At the upcoming meeting members will vote on a deal which will see the end to the ban and legitimize commercial whaling. The proposal would allow the three countries that have defied the ban to hunt legally provided they kill less whales than they have been doing illegally. This is a ridiculous proposal, it’s like telling a criminal that their activities are no longer illegal but as a trade-off they can no longer commit the crime so often. Firstly they probably won’t listen because they have already shown they have no respect for the law. Secondly, the international community should not bow to bully nations throwing their weight around. Thirdly, it completely disregards the fact that whaling is inherently inhumane and as such should not be inflicted on any number of whales.

How to Help

I have scouted around the net for various ways you can show governments and the IWC that you do not want to lift the ban on commercial whaling:

1. Everybody can sign this petition to the Norwegian Government  here

2. Everybody can join WSPA Australia’s campaign to give the whales a voice. They are asking everyone to record messages to the International Whaling Commission which they will take to the meeting on June 21st here

3.  In America you can write a letter to your senator asking them to support the International Whale Conservation Protection Act here. The USA is as ever a key decision maker and it id vital that they vote against lifting the ban.

4.  Email the International Whaling Commission to tell them what you think at secretariat@iwcoffice.org

5. In this international community it is important that we all show our national representatives how we feel.  You can find the name of the representative of your country in the IWC  here.  Please contact them and tell them how you would like your country to vote.

Australia Files Law Suit Against Japan over Whaling

June 4th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

Australia took a decisive step to protect whales, filing a suit in the International Court of Justice against Japan’s “scientific whaling” in the Southern Ocean. The suit seeks an injunction to bar Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean Whaling Sanctuary a 50-million square kilometer area surrounding the continent of Antarctica, where the IWC has banned all types of commercial whaling.

This news comes as the International Whaling Commision meet to discuss a possible compromise with whaling nations that would allow them  to resume commercial whaling with the understanding that they abide by quotas. The IWC is the body responsible for the management of whaling and its main purpose is to regulate the whaling industry. Established in 1946, in 2008 it has over 79 member countries.

Australia claims that Japan has abused its right to conduct scientific research whaling under Article VIII of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, which provides for a scientific exemption. They also assert that Japan has breached the terms of CITES by hunting endangered whale species.  In 2008-09 Japan killed 1,004 whales, including 681 in the Southern Ocean. Since the moratorium came into effect, more than 33,000 whales have been killed under the scientific exemption clause.

The Australians are willing to call Japanese whaling what it is — a mockery of science and a crime against nature. Lets hope the rest of the international community back them up on this one!

A tale of volunteering in Indonesia

May 30th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

Firstly, apologies for my lengthy absence from this e-zine.  I was in Sulawesi, Indonesia for 2 months volunteering at an animal rescue centre. Then upon my return I was mentally and physically exhausted and spent the last few weeks sleeping metaphorically and physically. However with a rising mojo I am back! Sometimes we all just need a little time out, especially in fields where you care deeply about issues that are so wide-spread and commonplace that it can tie you up in knots trying to figure out where to begin.

I digress, back to April when I went to volunteer at Tasikoki Animal Rescue Center. Now despite my passion for animal welfare, up until this point I had never volunteered in the ‘field’  unless you count my local RSPCA cat shelter. It was a total shock to the system which wasn’t helped by the severe sun burn and heat stroke that struck me on my stop-over in Singapore. 

The first night there was unbearably hot and I didn’t sleep a wink. So I was up and showered by the time the alarm clock went off at 5.30 am! Simon took us on our first day to show us the ropes. It was hot and tiring.  There are a lot of hills in Tasikoki. I was also terrified of the Macaques. They were stressed and scared – much like myself.  I was shocked by the conditions that they were living in. I thought to myself that their enclosures wouldn’t pass a lab inspection back in the UK. Aside from two release groups in Large open enclosures, the other macaques were kept either in solitary cages and slept on bars or in what I called cell block H where they live in small concrete enclosures with chicken wire walls. I couldn’t decide which was worse, the macaques in solitary looked worse off because of the bars and isolation but they were a lot calmer than those in cell block H. I think this was because in the cell block the macaques had no visual escape from each other, which caused a lot of stress and aggression. Read the rest of this entry »

What does new British government mean for fox-hunting?

May 30th, 2010

Contributed by, Nicola Gothard

Ok, so bad news first – the Conservative party are the largest party in British government with 307 seats. The good news is that they needed at least 323 to form a majority government and therefore had to form a coalition with the Liberal Democrats. Why is this good news? Well, because the Conservatives and Liberals couldn’t be further apart ideologically. The conservatives look after the landed classes and people with money in general, wanting to lower taxes on the rich, cut back on public spending and most importantly to me, repeal the fox-huting ban – favourite past time of the ‘old money’ landowners. On the other hand the Liberal Democrats care about people and to some extent animals too.

Unfortunately as part of the coalition agreement, on page 18 it states,  ”We will bring forward a motion on a free vote, enabling the House of Commons to express its view on the repeal of the Hunting Act.” So it appears likely that a vote on the issue will come up in parliament at some point in the next five years – provided the coalition makes it that far. However the Liberals are anti fox-hunting and don’t have to vote with the conservatives to repeal the ban. Labour brought the ban in to place and won’t want to see it repealed either. Hoever there may be other marginal parties that will side with the conservatives on the issue and it could be a very close contest.

As luck would have it a timetable for such a vote failed to materialise in the Queen’s Speech, effectively indicating that it was no longer a priority and had been shelved! This is possibly because they would be heavily criticised for prioritising a law that affects few people and is effectively about a past-time  when the country is facing a massive financial deficit and their are more universally important issues to address. It also might cause unnecessary friction with the Liberals.

So, it looks like the foxes are safe to live another day – for now! But we must not get complacent and we must continue to show that many more people oppose fox-hunting than support it. The country-side alliance is making more noise on the issue because they don’t have their way, we must not let them manipulate the issue. So 4000 members of the country-side alliance want fox hunting back – there are 70 million people in the UK!

Why You Can’t Tell a Sheep “Bon Voyage”

April 22nd, 2010

Contributed by Alina Lilova

Countless farm animals are subjected to long journeys across countries and even continents. To them, this is no small matter but a very unpleasant and sometimes even painful experience. The physiological evidence for this is plentiful. Stress hormones like cortisol rise steeply in sheep during transport, and ewes may skip or delay their estrus (heat) cycle. The immune systems of pigs become weaker. Chickens may overheat and die, even on cold days. Many animals also suffer injuries from bumping into each other and falling on the ground, and from poor handling when they are loaded or unloaded from the vehicles. Just the vibration and noise of a lorry can feel uncomfortable and scary to the animal, especially if he has been raised in a barren environment with little chance to explore new things. In fact, pigs who were placed in a transport simulator and shown how to turn it off quickly learnt to press the switch panel, choosing to keep the apparatus off most of the time.

As long as physical injuries and deaths are kept to a low percentage (and “low” is defined by purely economic considerations), the industry has little interest in shortening journey lengths or improving standards, and laws are often inadequate even in the EU – hence the large amount of undercover investigations, campaigns and petitions against long-distance transport.

At times the industry may argue that what seems to be a cruel practice is actually better for the animals. For example, currently in the European Union adult sheep may be transported for up to 14 hours, then given a single hour for rest, water and perhaps food, then travel for another 14 hours straight. During that time, they are usually packed like sardines in a box, with only a third of a square metre per sheep. Imagine travelling for 28 hours squeezed inside a dark, crowded bus and having no idea of what’s going to happen to you. It must be worse than being stranded in an airport because a volcano erupted in Iceland – and yet it’s daily reality for millions of animals. Nevertheless, some will have you believe that the crowding is necessary to keep the sheep from falling and hurting themselves on rough roads.

A group of scientists challenged this view in a recently published experiment. They put sheep in a double-decker livestock lorry and had a commercial driver give them a 6-hour ride along a variety of roads (from motorways to minor country roads). The sheep – ewes and lambs – were grouped into five categories with different space allowances, from the minimum set out by the European Regulation, to more than 1 sq. m per animal. Sheep with their fleece on had more room than shorn sheep. Cameras captured the movement of the animals and sent live video to the scientists.

Sheep packed in lorry according to the European minimum - which is often what the industry uses. Photo: CCTV by Jones et al.

The sheep who had more space tended to lose balance, slip and fall far less than the sheep who were tightly packed. The effect was particularly pronounced when the road was bad. Like people, sheep sought to maintain balance not by pressing onto their companions, but simply by spreading their legs or taking small steps back and forth so the inertia doesn’t rock them off their feet. No matter how social sheep are and how much they like to flock together, a crowded lorry would not be their idea of time well spent. Furthermore, the sheep were much more likely to be trampled by their neighbours when they had little space, and in one case it took a sheep over an hour to stand again after being forced to the floor. Also, after four hours of travel, many of the sheep got obviously very tired and wanted to lie down – but those ‘enjoying’ “the European minimum” didn’t have much opportunity for such rest.

If you would like to do something for the sheep and other species that commonly endure long journeys in awful conditions, check out NGO’s like Compassion in World Farming and Animals’ Angels.

Sources:

Appleby, M. and Hughes, B., eds. Animal Welfare. CABI Publishing, 2007.

Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2005/l_003/l_00320050105en00010044.pdf

Jones, T., Waitt, C. and Dawkins, M. “Sheep lose balance, slip and fall less when loosely packed in transit where they stand close to but not touching their neighbours.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123 (2010) 16-23.